


The 2009 Southern Baptist Convention annual meeting is in the books and I thought I’d share a few of my observations about what took place.
First, THE GOOD: It is always good to be back in Louisville, my family’s home for nearly 11 years as I attended Southern Seminary and pastored a church. It was especially meaningful to be in Louisville for Southern’s 150th celebration. My years at Southern were some of the most meaningful of my life, and it was good to see several friends from my time there.
I was also pleased that the convention basically endorsed the Great Commission Resurgence document, in the sense that a Great Commission Task Force was appointed. I’m pleased that there is a formal emphasis on refocusing Southern Baptists on the Great Commission. However, the real need is a Great Commission Resurgence in the hearts of Southern Baptists, a renewed sense of urgency to reach the lost and a true repentance for our disobedience. My fear is that we will adopt the resolution and try to take care of our problem on an institutional level instead of at a heart level. It’s a good first step, but I hope it doesn’t stop there.
I was pleased with the resolutions that passed. Each one was well-worded, timely and a good representation of what I think the SBC is.
I was also challenged by one of the best, most convicting messages I’ve ever heard. On Monday night of the pastor’s conference, David Platt challenged us to decide if we are going to die in our religion or die in our devotion. When I can, I will post the message or a link to it. It was truly a word from the Lord.
Second, THE BAD: I was disappointed at Morris Chapman’s comments about Calvinism during the Executive Committee presentation. Not only were they inaccurate in their nature, but very untimely. Of all the things to focus on during the convention, Calvinism in the SBC was the least useful.
I was also a bit disappointed by the Great Commission Resurgence study committee that was appointed. As is so typical in the SBC, it was made up of the typical group of known names and narrow demographics. I would like to have seen a greater diversity in gender, geography, and church size. The good thing is, though, that those elected to serve to represent of the best our denomination has to offer. My great hope is that they will recommend, among other things, a serious look at restructuring, streamlining, and simplifying the national convention, as well as some recommendations about the need for the current state convention set-up as it is. It seems that there is much overlap in the national, state, and local association levels.
Finally, THE UGLY: I’m always amazed at what happens when you open the microphone up to anyone who wants to speak. Some of the motions offered were really interesting, some were a bit bizarre, and some were downright off the mark. I’m especially stymied by some people’s obsession with Mark Driscoll and the Acts 29 Network. We, who are in denominations, are going to have to learn to cooperate in Kingdom work with those who share our convictions about the primary matters of the faith even though we differ on the secondary and tertiary matters of the faith, or on methodology.
Overall, I thought it was a very positive week for Southern Baptists. We have much work to do–most of which must take place in the hearts of the individuals in the churches that make up the SBC.